<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Fourth Circuit Labor and Employment Decisions</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/01/recent-fourth-circuit-labor-and-employment-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/01/recent-fourth-circuit-labor-and-employment-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concerted Activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarbanes-Oxley Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fourth Circuit has published opinions in three labor and employment cases in recent weeks.  The first case, Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc., concerned a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action that was brought on behalf of a class of current and former employees of a chicken processing plant.  The employees claimed, among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Circuit has published opinions in three labor and employment cases in recent weeks.  The first case, <a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/dailyopinions/opinion.pdf/082256.P.pdf">Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc.</a>, concerned a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action that was brought on behalf of a class of current and former employees of a chicken processing plant.  The employees claimed, among other things, that the company had violated the <span onclick="pNav.setHitno(5,1)" onmouseover="pNav.tOn(this)" onmouseout="pNav.tOff(this)">FLSA</span> by not compensating them for time spent donning and doffing their protective gear before and after their shifts.  There is a specific exception in FLSA for cases regarding compensable time for &#8220;changing clothes&#8221; when the employees are represented by a union that has negotiated a collective bargaining unit.  The Court held that putting on and taking off protecting gear was &#8220;changing clothes,&#8221; so the exception applied because these plaintiffs had a union, and so judgment was rightly granted to the employer.</p>
<p><span id="more-1066"></span>In the second case, <a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/dailyopinions/opinion.pdf/081970.P.pdf">Stone v. Instrumentation Labratory Company</a>, the Court clarified how employees may pursue retaliation claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides employees of publicly traded companies with whistleblower protection, prohibiting employers from terminating, or otherwise retaliating against, such employees when they report &#8220;potentially unlawful conduct&#8221; that has occurred or is in <a name="1292-11"></a>progress.  The unlawful conduct is often securities fraud or other types of fraud, including making misrepresentations to shareholders.  To pursue a retaliation claim, a plaintiff must first file a complaint with the Department of Labor (which is handled by its OSHA office), and if no final decision is issued in 180 days, the plaintiff may file an action in federal district court.  The Court reaffirmed this procedure, and held that the district court improperly failed to hear a properly filed retaliation action.</p>
<p>In the third case, <a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/091148.P.pdf">Alton H. Piester, LLC v. NLRB</a>, the Court upheld the NLRB&#8217;s determination that the employer had committed unfair labor practices by (1) impliedly threatening to discharge its employees if they continued to engage in protected, concerted activity &#8212; objecting as a group to a change in pay policies &#8212; and (2) by impliedly threatening to discharge and then actually discharging an employee for continuing to engage in similar protected, concerted activity.  The majority of the Court concluded that the Board&#8217;s decision on both unfair labor practices was supported by substantial evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/01/recent-fourth-circuit-labor-and-employment-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Organizes Annual Labor Laywer Meeting with NLRB in Winston-Salem</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/10/mike-organizes-annual-labor-laywer-meeting-with-nlrb-in-winston-salem/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/10/mike-organizes-annual-labor-laywer-meeting-with-nlrb-in-winston-salem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News of the Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Okun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the Committee on Practice and Procedure under the NLRA (Southern Region (Region VIII) of the ABA’s Labor and Employment Section), Mike Okun helped organize the annual discussion between the labor bar and the NLRB Region 11’s Director, attorneys, and staff.   At today&#8217;s meeting at the NLRB office in Winston-Salem, we had the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of the Committee on Practice and Procedure under the NLRA (Southern Region (Region  VIII) of the ABA’s Labor and Employment Section), <a href="/staff/michael-g-okun/" title="" >Mike Okun</a> helped organize the annual discussion between the labor bar and the NLRB Region 11’s Director, attorneys, and staff.   At today&#8217;s meeting at the NLRB office in Winston-Salem, we had the good fortune to be joined by John E. Higgins, Jr,  currently the agency’s Deputy General Counsel, who filled us in on  developments at the national level, including the NLRB&#8217;s work with only two board members and the potential effects of EFCA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/10/mike-organizes-annual-labor-laywer-meeting-with-nlrb-in-winston-salem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows that Unions Help Make Family-Friendly Workplaces</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family-Friendly Workplaces: Do Unions Make a Difference?, written by Jennifer MacGillvary of the Labor Center at the University of California-Berkeley and Netsy Firestein of the Labor Project for Working Families, concludes the unions lead to workplaces that, through policy and practice, promote a healthy and viable balance between work life and home life.   Significantly, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/jobquality/familyfriendly09.pdf">Family-Friendly Workplaces: Do Unions Make a Difference?</a>, written by Jennifer MacGillvary of the Labor Center at the University of California-Berkeley and Netsy Firestein of the Labor Project for Working Families, concludes the unions lead to workplaces that, through policy and practice, promote a healthy and viable balance between work life and home life.   Significantly, the study finds that unions increase compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act, ensure paid sick leave for employees and their children, and increase the likelihood that health care is covered for families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USW Workers Ratify Goodyear Contract</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/usw-workers-ratify-goodyear-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/usw-workers-ratify-goodyear-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodyear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United Steelworkers (USW) announced that workers overwhelmingly ratified a new four-year agreement covering about10,000 union members at seven Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. plants, including the plant in Fayetteville, North Carolina.  The new pact provides job security and maintains quality, affordable health care for the union members.  It also provides for a commitment by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Steelworkers (USW) <a href="http://www.usw.org/media_center/releases_advisories?id=0220">announced </a>that workers overwhelmingly ratified a new four-year agreement covering about10,000 union members at seven Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. plants, including the plant in Fayetteville, North Carolina.  The new pact provides job security and maintains quality, affordable health care for the union members.  It also provides for a commitment by Goodyear to invest $600 million in the plants, keeping them up to date and globally competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/usw-workers-ratify-goodyear-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Free Choice Act Update &#8212; Specter Edition</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/employee-free-choice-act-update-specter-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/employee-free-choice-act-update-specter-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Arlen Specter has released more details on the EFCA compromise he has been working on, and also declared his confidence that he had 60 votes for the bill.  Instead of the majority sign-up provision, the bill would provide for quicker union elections with some sort of equal-time requirements.  And, the binding arbitration would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Arlen Specter has <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/09/specter_unveils_prospective_de.html?hpid=news-col-blog">released more details</a> on the EFCA compromise he has been working on, and also declared his confidence that he had 60 votes for the bill.  Instead of the majority sign-up provision, the bill would provide for quicker union elections with some sort of equal-time requirements.  And, the binding <a href="/practice-areas/mediation-adr/" title="" >arbitration</a> would be adjusted to use baseball-style arbitration, i.e. the arbitrator has to pick one of the final offers of the parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/employee-free-choice-act-update-specter-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows that Low Wage Workers are Subject to a Host of Employment and Labor Law Violations</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-low-wage-workers-are-subject-to-a-host-of-employment-and-labor-law-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-low-wage-workers-are-subject-to-a-host-of-employment-and-labor-law-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study, &#8220;Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers,&#8221; shows that employers routinely violate the employment rights  of low wage workers, with frequent violations of the wage and hour laws, workers&#8217; compensation laws, and anti-retaliation protections.  (The original study is here; a summary of the study is here.)  Here are some of the startling findings: 68 percent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study, &#8220;Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers,&#8221; shows that employers routinely violate the employment rights  of low wage workers, with frequent violations of the <a href="/practice-areas/wage-hour-employment-law/" title="" >wage and hour</a> laws, <a href="/practice-areas/workers-compensation/" title="" >workers&#8217; compensation</a> laws, and anti-retaliation protections.  (The original study is <a href="http://nelp.3cdn.net/59719b5a36109ab7d8_5xm6bc9ap.pdf">here</a>; a summary of the study is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/02/us/02wage.html">here</a>.)  Here are some of the startling findings:</p>
<ul>
<li>68 percent of the workers interviewed had experienced at least one pay-related violation in the previous work week, including failures to pay earned wages, at least minimum wage, or overtime pay.</li>
<li>26 percent of the workers had been paid less than the minimum wage the week before being surveyed and that one in seven had worked off the clock the previous week.</li>
<li>76 percent of those who had worked overtime the week before were not paid their proper overtime.<span id="more-449"></span></li>
<li>Of workers who receive tips, 12 percent said  their employer had stolen some of the tips.</li>
<li>One in five workers reported having lodged a complaint about wages to their employer or trying to form a union in the previous year, and 43 percent of them said they had experienced some form of illegal retaliation, like firing or suspension.</li>
<li>Employers  pressured workers not to file for workers’ compensation, so that only 8 percent of those who suffered serious injuries on the job filed for compensation to pay for medical care and missed days at work stemming from those injuries.</li>
<li>In instances when workers’ compensation should have been used, one third of workers injured on the job paid the bills for treatment out of their own pocket and 22 percent used their health insurance.</li>
<li>Workers’ compensation insurance paid medical expenses for only 6 percent of the injured workers surveyed.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-low-wage-workers-are-subject-to-a-host-of-employment-and-labor-law-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Free Choice Act Update</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/employee-free-choice-act-update/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/employee-free-choice-act-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narendra Ghosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the latest update on the Senate negotiations on EFCA.  As expected, it comes down to figuring out what the moderate Democrats in the Senate will support.  For more information of the various parts of the bill, see Narendra&#8217;s paper on the NLRA and EFCA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/business/17union.html">latest update on the Senate negotiations on EFCA</a>.  As expected, it comes down to figuring out what the moderate Democrats in the Senate will support.  For more information of the various parts of the bill, see <a href="/wp-content/uploads/Labor-Paper-for-NCBA-CLE.pdf">Narendra&#8217;s paper</a> on the NLRA and EFCA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/employee-free-choice-act-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike and Valerie Teach at Labor School</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/mike-and-valerie-teach-at-labor-school/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/mike-and-valerie-teach-at-labor-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News of the Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Okun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valerie Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Okun and Valerie Johnson taught at the annual labor school put on by the North Carolina AFL-CIO State Federation, which was held at UNC Wilmington.  Mike teaches the bulk of the program, which introduces union workers and leaders to labor law and related legal topics.  Valerie teaches the session on workers&#8217; compensation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/staff/michael-g-okun/" title="" >Michael Okun</a> and <a href="/staff/valerie-a-johnson/" title="" >Valerie Johnson</a> taught at the annual labor school put on by the North Carolina AFL-CIO State Federation, which was held at UNC Wilmington.  Mike teaches the bulk of the program, which introduces union workers and leaders to labor law and related legal topics.  Valerie teaches the session on <a href="/practice-areas/workers-compensation/" title="" >workers&#8217; compensation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/mike-and-valerie-teach-at-labor-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Serious Labor Violation</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/another-serious-labor-violation/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/another-serious-labor-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fourth Circuit affirms the granting of some injunctive relief to remedy, after much delay, very serious labor violations by a mining company in NLRB v. Spartan Mining Company.  The company had illegal discriminated against members of the United Mine Workers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fourth Circuit <a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/dailyopinions/opinion.pdf/081973.P.pdf">affirms the granting of some injunctive relief</a> to remedy, after much delay, very serious labor violations by a mining company in <em>NLRB v. Spartan Mining Company</em>.  The company had illegal discriminated against members of the United Mine Workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/07/another-serious-labor-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UFCW Local 1208 successfully Negotiates Contract at Smithfield</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/06/ufcw-at-smithfield/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/06/ufcw-at-smithfield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smithfield Packing Company and the bargaining committee of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 1208 reached a tentative agreement on a first contract for the workers at the Tar Heel pork processing facility.   More coverage is avaliable here, which recounts the union&#8217;s efforts and the company&#8217;s at times illegal opposition over the years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smithfield Packing Company and the bargaining committee of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 1208 reached a <a href="http://www.ufcw.org/press_room/index.cfm?pressReleaseID=444">tentative agreement on a first contract</a> for the workers at the Tar Heel pork processing facility.   More coverage is avaliable <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Smithfield-Packing-union-apf-3246515293.html?x=0&amp;.v=8">here</a>, which recounts the union&#8217;s efforts and the company&#8217;s at times illegal opposition over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/06/ufcw-at-smithfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
