<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Out on Economy and Young Workers</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/new-report-out-on-economy-and-young-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/new-report-out-on-economy-and-young-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public policy research group Dēmos and the non-profit Young Invincibles, published a new report which came out last month.  The report analyzes the economic status of the &#8220;Millennial Generation&#8221; as compared to previous generations.  &#8221;The analysis reveals the failure of public investment and public policy to provide young people with the means to achieve economic security [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public policy research group <a href="http://www.demos.org/publication/state-young-america-databook">Dēmos</a> and the non-profit Young Invincibles, published a new report which came out last month.  The report analyzes the economic status of the &#8220;Millennial Generation&#8221; as compared to previous generations.  &#8221;The analysis reveals the failure of public investment and public policy to provide young people with the means to achieve economic security and sustain the middle class.&#8221;  The report can be found <a href="http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/SOYA_TheDatabook_1.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>Introduction to the Jobs and the Economy section:</p>
<p>&#8220;Our nation has experienced profound economic change over the last three decades. Globalization, new technologies, and deliberate public policies shifted our economy from the production of goods to the production of knowledge and services. As millions of unionized factory jobs moved overseas, our nation lost a primary source of middle-class jobs for people without college degrees. Less-educated workers now have few options outside of non-unionized, low-wage service occupations.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/new-report-out-on-economy-and-young-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Unemployment Benefits Should be Renewed</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NELP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Employment Law Project (NELP) published an excellent paper in October, arguing for a one-year extension of the Federal Unemployment Insurance benefits for unemployed workers.  The paper is entitled &#8220;Hanging On By a Thread: Renew Federal Unemployment Insurance to Aid Families, Boost Stalled Economy&#8221; The paper states: &#8220;Unless Congress reauthorizes the current federal extension [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National <a href="http://pathlaw.com/practice-areas/wage-hour-employment-law/" title="" >Employment Law</a> Project (NELP) published an excellent paper in October, arguing for a one-year extension of the Federal Unemployment Insurance benefits for unemployed workers.  The paper is entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.nelp.org/page/-/UI/2011/NELP_UI_Extension_Report_2011.pdf?nocdn=1">Hanging On By a Thread: Renew Federal Unemployment Insurance to Aid Families, Boost Stalled Economy</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>The paper states: &#8220;Unless Congress reauthorizes the current federal extension programs before the December 31st deadline, millions of workers and their families will be left without their primary means of support to buy food, pay the rent or mortgage, and cover their other most basic necessities.&#8221;</p>
<p>NELP&#8217;s paper also argues that extending benefits will help families as well as give the economy a leg up:  &#8220;Consistent with the prior research, [Wayne Vroman of the Urban Institute] found that the nation’s economy grew by $2 for every dollar spent on unemployment insurance during the latest recession, as unemployed workers spent their benefits in their communities at grocery stores, gas stations, and other retailers and service providers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Majority Leader Harry Reid has <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1211/Reid_threatens_Senate_sessions_through_Christmas.html">vowed</a> to keep Congress in session in D.C. until federal unemployment benefits are renewed for the coming year, even if they have to work through the holidays to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Machinists&#8217; Union and Boeing Work to Extend Contract</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/machinists-union-and-boeing-work-to-extend-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/machinists-union-and-boeing-work-to-extend-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Bargaining Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAMAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last, week, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW) and Boeing reached a tentative agreement which would extend the Union&#8217;s contract for four years and, when ratified, will increase wages, maintain and improve traditional pensions and add new jobs.  The Union and Boeing have been in a troubled relationship recently since Boeing decided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last, week, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW) and Boeing reached a tentative agreement which would extend the Union&#8217;s contract for four years and, when ratified, will increase wages, maintain and improve traditional pensions and add new jobs.  The Union and Boeing have been in a troubled relationship recently since Boeing decided to build a new plant for its 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina where unions are weak.  The National Labor Relations Board filed a suit claiming that Boeing had decided to build the new plant in South Carolina in illegal retaliation against the Union for striking.  That case now looks like it may be dropped if the new contract is ratified by the Boeing employees.   Additional coverage <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/01/business/boeing-agrees-on-contract-with-machinists.html  ">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/machinists-union-and-boeing-work-to-extend-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama Signs Jobs Bill Helping Veterans</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama this week signed into law the first portion of his jobs package. The bill, H.R. 674, which had vast bipartisan support, also known as VOW to Hire Heroes Act, creates tax incentives for companies to hire veterans, especially those who have been unemployed for more than six months and those with service connected disabilities. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama this week signed into law the first portion of his jobs package. The bill, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-674">H.R. 674</a>, which had vast bipartisan support, also known as VOW to Hire Heroes Act, creates tax incentives for companies to hire veterans, especially those who have been unemployed for more than six months and those with service connected disabilities.  Though there has been very little action from Congress on the jobs front, this is an encouraging first step.  Hopefully the House and Senate can get their act together and start really helping unemployed workers secure employment, and in doing so jump-start the economy.  More on the bill <a href="http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/21/president-obama-signs-veterans-tax-credit-bill/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Benefits Extended through 2011; More Help Needed</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/unemployment-benefits-extended-through-2011-more-help-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/unemployment-benefits-extended-through-2011-more-help-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, President Obama signed the large tax cut bill that includes an extension of extended unemployment benefits through the end of 2011.  While, the extension of those benefits was sorely needed, it is extremely unfortunate that the bill did not include additional spending measures that would stimulate the economy.  As further evidence that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/12/17/868402/bill-preventing-big-tax-hikes.html">President Obama signed the large tax cut bill</a> that includes an extension of extended unemployment benefits through the end of 2011.  While, the extension of those benefits was sorely needed, it is extremely unfortunate that the bill did not include additional spending measures that would stimulate the economy.  As further evidence that the Great Recession continues, the <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/12/18/869551_nc-job-loss-uptick-first-since.html">latest report</a> shows that North Carolina lost 12,500 jobs in November, more than any other state, pushing the statewide unemployment rate to 9.7 percent.  Without further assistance, the economy is unlikely to grow enough to create the needed amount of jobs.  And, 2011 state budget cuts, which are starting to be discussed, are likely to make things even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/unemployment-benefits-extended-through-2011-more-help-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions to Lose Unemployment Benefits, Even if Extension Passes; New Course of Action Needed</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monthly Job Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Fiscal Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if Congress manages to extend emergency unemployment benefits for more the millions of workers who could receive them, about four million others will see their benefits end over the next year, unless an entirely new program is created.  This is according to a report recently issued by the President&#8217;s Council of Economic Advisers.  So, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Congress manages to extend emergency unemployment benefits for more the millions of workers who could receive them, about four million others will see their benefits end over the next year, unless an entirely new program is created.  This is according to a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-benefits-99ers-obama_n_791682.html">report recently issued by the President&#8217;s Council of Economic Advisers</a>.  So, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/us/04unemployed.html">the crisis facing some now</a> is going to be experienced by even more later, unless serious job-creating actions are taken.</p>
<p>You would think that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/business/economy/04jobs.html">the latest, terrible monthly jobs report</a> would convince those in power that the Great Recession continues unabated, doing terrible damage to working families.  Those unemployed for long periods face <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/business/economy/03unemployed.html">especially long odds of finding work</a> in today&#8217;s economy.  And, even for those with good jobs, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/20/business/20wages.html">wages are continuing to be cut</a> as even profitable employers take advantage of the ongoing crisis for workers.</p>
<p>Misguided worries about the budget deficit are allowing Republicans and <a href="http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/12/03/casting-light-on-%E2%80%9Cthe-moment-of-truth%E2%80%9D-28850/">the Deficit Commission</a> to pursue Social-Security-cutting, Medicare-slashing, job-destroying agenda instead of a program that can end the Great Recession and put people back to work.  A new course of action is needed, and responsible policy options are out there.  For instance, check out <a href="http://www.ourfiscalsecurity.org/storage/Blueprint_ExecSumm.pdf">the program</a> set out by <a href="http://www.ourfiscalsecurity.org/fiscal-blueprint">Our Fiscal Security</a>, a collaborative effort of Demos, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and The Century Foundation (TCF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Provides Funds to Save Teacher Jobs</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Assistants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the Senate finally passed the $26 billion package to aid states that are still reeling from the effects of the recession.  The legislation provides $10 billion to retain teachers who might otherwise lose jobs to cutbacks, and an additional $16 billion to help states with rising health care costs.  The bill was quickly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Senate <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/us/politics/06cong.html">finally passed</a> the $26 billion package to aid states that are still reeling from the effects of the recession.  The legislation provides $10 billion to retain teachers who might otherwise lose jobs to cutbacks, and an additional $16 billion to help states with rising health care costs.  The bill was quickly passed by the House and signed by President Obama.</p>
<p>Of that amount, North Carolina received about $300 million to save teachers&#8217; jobs.  North Carolina leaders are <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/08/13/626826/nc-explores-use-of-300-million.html">now figuring out when and how to use the money</a>.  Obviously, one possibility would be to use some of the funds to re-hire teachers and teaching assistants who were recently laid off due to budget cuts.  Also, some amount may be saved till next year, when the state&#8217;s deficit will reach its highest level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Continue Assault on Unemployed Workers</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill, mustering the 41 votes needed on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/us/politics/25jobs.html"> mustering the 41 votes needed</a> on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job growth.</p>
<p>On top of that, failure to pass the bills means states <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26states.html">will not receive the much-needed $23 billion</a> to pay for sharply rising Medicaid costs.  (The great recession has swelled the ranks of those eligible for health insurance through Medicaid.)  Without this money, states will be forced to impose even greater cut backs, which will mean lost jobs for teachers and other state employees.</p>
<p>Republicans say they oppose the bill on the grounds that it raises the deficit, but what they really oppose are the small tax increases (such as one on hedge fund managers) that would be used to pay for the bill.  Disappointingly, the NY Times notes that the &#8220;Obama administration has not fought aggressively for the legislation.&#8221;  It appears the President is not focusing on jobs, which should be his highest priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Signs HIRE Act to Spur Jobs</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-hire-act-to-spur-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-hire-act-to-spur-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIRE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 18, President Obama signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act (H.R. 2847, summary here), a $38 billion jobs bill comprised of several tax breaks and spending provisions to encourage employers to start hiring again.  The bill includes a one-year extension of the federal highway program, an extension of the Build America [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 18, President Obama <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/18/us/politics/AP-US-Obama-Jobs-Bill.html">signed</a> the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act (H.R. 2847, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2847&amp;tab=summary">summary here</a>), a $38 billion jobs bill comprised of several tax breaks and spending provisions to encourage employers to start hiring again.  The bill includes a one-year extension of the federal highway program, an extension of the Build America Bonds program that helps states finance certain infrastructure projects, and various tax breaks for hiring and retaining previously unemployed workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-hire-act-to-spur-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

