<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Health Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hank Speaks at Workers&#8217; Compensation Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/03/hank-and-valerie-speak-at-workers-compensation-roundtable/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/03/hank-and-valerie-speak-at-workers-compensation-roundtable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News of the Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Health Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, Hank Patterson spoke at the 16th Annual Workers&#8217; Comp Roundtable, a CLE put on by the North Carolina Advocates for Justice.  Hank was part of a panel addressing the proper language for Social Security offset language.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, <a href="/staff/henry-n-patterson-jr/" title="" >Hank Patterson</a> spoke at the 16th Annual Workers&#8217; Comp Roundtable, a CLE put on by the North Carolina Advocates for Justice.  Hank was part of a panel addressing the proper language for Social Security offset language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/03/hank-and-valerie-speak-at-workers-compensation-roundtable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decreasing Wages Continue Trend that Helped Cause Great Recession</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/09/decreasing-wages-continue-trend-that-helped-cause-great-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/09/decreasing-wages-continue-trend-that-helped-cause-great-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several recent articles highlight both the continuing pressure on workers&#8217; wages as well how decreasing wages helped cause the Great Recession in the first place. This article points to a troubling reality that even for those unemployed people fortunate to find a new job, that new job often means a decrease in wages and living [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several recent articles highlight both the continuing pressure on workers&#8217; wages as well how decreasing wages helped cause the Great Recession in the first place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/us/01jobs.html">This article</a> points to a troubling reality that even for those unemployed people fortunate to find a new job, that new job often means a decrease in wages and living standards.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/business/03insure.html">This article</a> describes how the entire annual increase in health care costs is being borne by employees with employer health insurance instead of being borne by the employers.  This is but one example of the skyrocketing cost of health care over the years has eaten away at any wages gains for the working class.</p>
<p>Finally, this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/opinion/03reich.html">extremely insighful op-ed</a> by former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich describes how the generation-long erosion of working class wages helped fuel the debt boom that ended in the Great Recession.  Unless and until serious measures are enacted to improve the wages of the working class, we will not experience a sustainable recovery or return to general prosperity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/09/decreasing-wages-continue-trend-that-helped-cause-great-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Continue Assault on Unemployed Workers</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill, mustering the 41 votes needed on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/us/politics/25jobs.html"> mustering the 41 votes needed</a> on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job growth.</p>
<p>On top of that, failure to pass the bills means states <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26states.html">will not receive the much-needed $23 billion</a> to pay for sharply rising Medicaid costs.  (The great recession has swelled the ranks of those eligible for health insurance through Medicaid.)  Without this money, states will be forced to impose even greater cut backs, which will mean lost jobs for teachers and other state employees.</p>
<p>Republicans say they oppose the bill on the grounds that it raises the deficit, but what they really oppose are the small tax increases (such as one on hedge fund managers) that would be used to pay for the bill.  Disappointingly, the NY Times notes that the &#8220;Obama administration has not fought aggressively for the legislation.&#8221;  It appears the President is not focusing on jobs, which should be his highest priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice for Workers Losing COBRA Subsidy</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/12/advice-for-workers-losing-cobra-subsidy/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/12/advice-for-workers-losing-cobra-subsidy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One part of the President&#8217;s stimulus package early this year provided a 65% subsidy for COBRA health insurance benefits.  The subsidy, however, only lasts nine months, so it expiring for many people soon.  Unfortunately, Congress has failed to extend the benefit yet, though it may still do so early next year.  This NY Times article [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One part of the President&#8217;s stimulus package early this year provided a 65% subsidy for COBRA health insurance benefits.  The subsidy, however, only lasts nine months, so it expiring for many people soon.  Unfortunately, Congress has failed to extend the benefit yet, though it may still do so early next year.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/health/12patient.html">This NY Times article</a> has very useful advice for workers about to lose the subsidized benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/12/advice-for-workers-losing-cobra-subsidy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

