<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Family and Medical Leave Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/family-and-medical-leave-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Expands FMLA to Cover Non-Traditional Families</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/dol-expands-fmla-to-cover-non-traditional-families/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/dol-expands-fmla-to-cover-non-traditional-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work and Family Balance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal Department of Labor issued some important guidance regarding the coverage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) as it applies to all sorts of unconventional families. The DOL made clear that FMLA rights to get time off to care for children do not require a biological relationship with the child. Rather, anyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal <a href="http://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/index.htm">Department of Labor</a> issued <a href="http://www.dol.gov/whd/opinion/adminIntrprtn/FMLA/2010/FMLAAI2010_3.pdf">some important guidance</a> regarding the coverage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) as it applies to all sorts of unconventional families.  The DOL made clear that FMLA rights to get time off to care for children do not require a biological relationship with the child.  Rather, anyone who has assumed the role of parent (for example a non-married step-parent, grandparent, or same-sex partner) is entitled to FMLA leave to care for the child.  Continue for highlights from the guidance: <span id="more-1403"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The FMLA entitles an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of job-protected leave, in relevant part, “[b]ecause of the birth of a son or daughter of the employee and in order to care for such son or daughter,” “[b]ecause of the placement of a son or daughter with the employee for adoption or foster care,” and to care for a son or daughter with a serious health condition. See 29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1)(A)-(C); 29 C.F.R. § 825.200. The FMLA defines a “son or daughter” as a “biological, adopted, or foster child, a stepchild, a legal ward, or a child of a person standing in loco parentis, who is— (A) under 18 years of age; or (B) 18 years of age or older and incapable of self-care because of a mental or physical disability.” 29 U.S.C. § 2611(12).
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Congress intended the definition of “son or daughter” to reflect “the reality that many children in the United States today do not live in traditional ‘nuclear’ families with their biological father and mother. Increasingly, those who find themselves in need of workplace accommodation of their child care responsibilities are not the biological parent of the children they care for, but their adoptive, step, or foster parents, their guardians, or sometimes simply their grandparents or other relatives or adults.”
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In loco parentis is commonly understood to refer to “a person who has put himself in the situation of a lawful parent by assuming the obligations incident to the parental relation without going through the formalities necessary to legal adoption. It embodies the two ideas of assuming the parental status and discharging the parental duties.” . . . “The key in determining whether the relationship of in loco parentis is established is found in the intention of the person allegedly in loco parentis to assume the status of a parent toward the child. The intent to assume such parental status can be inferred from the acts of the parties.”  Whether an employee stands in loco parentis to a child is a fact issue dependent on multiple factors.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Examples of situations in which an in loco parentis relationship may be found include where a grandparent takes in a grandchild and assumes ongoing responsibility for raising the child because the parents are incapable of providing care, or where an aunt assumes responsibility for raising a child after the death of the child’s parents. Such situations may, or may not, ultimately lead to a legal relationship with the child (adoption or legal ward), but no such relationship is required to find in loco parentis status. In contrast, an employee who cares for a child while the child’s parents are on vacation would not be considered to be in loco parentis to the child.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/dol-expands-fmla-to-cover-non-traditional-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-Ed Calling for Paid Maternity and Family Leave</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternity Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unpaid Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work and Family Balance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An op-ed in the Washington Post calls for paid family and maternity leave because the 12 weeks of unpaid leave provided by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is grossly inadequate.  Sharon Lerner traces the history of legislative efforts to provide paid leave to support workers&#8217; families, the compromised law that is the FMLA, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An op-ed in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/11/AR2010061103251.html">calls for paid family and maternity leave</a> because the 12 weeks of unpaid leave provided by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is grossly inadequate.  Sharon Lerner traces the history of legislative efforts to provide paid leave to support workers&#8217; families, the compromised law that is the FMLA, and the pernicious effects of inadequate paid leave.  The need for reform is stark:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to paid maternity leave, the United States is in the postpartum dark ages.  One hundred and seventy-seven nations &#8212; including Djibouti, Haiti and Afghanistan &#8212; have laws on the books requiring that all women, and in some cases men, receive both income and job-protected time off after the birth of a child. But here, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 provides only unpaid leave, and most working mothers don&#8217;t get to stay home with their newborns for the 12 weeks allowed by the law. Many aren&#8217;t covered by the FMLA; others can&#8217;t afford to take unpaid time off. Some go back to work a few weeks after giving birth, and some go back after mere days.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Signs Expansion of FMLA for Military Families</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/11/president-signs-expansion-of-fmla-for-military-families/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/11/president-signs-expansion-of-fmla-for-military-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, President Obama signed the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an appropriations bill that includes an expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for military families.  Specifically, it broadens the scope of caregiver and exigency leave for military families.  Details should be available from the Department of Labor in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/10/expanded-fmla-coverage-for-servicemembers.html">President Obama signed the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)</a>, an appropriations bill that includes an expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for military families.  Specifically, it broadens the scope of caregiver and exigency leave for military families.  Details should be available from the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ESA/WHD/fmla/index.htm">Department of Labor</a> in short order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/11/president-signs-expansion-of-fmla-for-military-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows that Unions Help Make Family-Friendly Workplaces</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterson-harkavy.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family-Friendly Workplaces: Do Unions Make a Difference?, written by Jennifer MacGillvary of the Labor Center at the University of California-Berkeley and Netsy Firestein of the Labor Project for Working Families, concludes the unions lead to workplaces that, through policy and practice, promote a healthy and viable balance between work life and home life.   Significantly, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/jobquality/familyfriendly09.pdf">Family-Friendly Workplaces: Do Unions Make a Difference?</a>, written by Jennifer MacGillvary of the Labor Center at the University of California-Berkeley and Netsy Firestein of the Labor Project for Working Families, concludes the unions lead to workplaces that, through policy and practice, promote a healthy and viable balance between work life and home life.   Significantly, the study finds that unions increase compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act, ensure paid sick leave for employees and their children, and increase the likelihood that health care is covered for families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2009/09/study-shows-that-unions-help-make-family-friendly-workplaces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

