<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB to Speed up Unionizing Elections</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/nlrb-to-speed-up-unionizing-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/nlrb-to-speed-up-unionizing-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IUOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 21, The National Labor Relations Board voted 2-1 in favor of new steps to increase the speed of union elections.  The Board hopes to keep election and campaign time to less than 21 days.  Often, there are long delays to unionizing elections because of legal challenges brought by the employer.  The Board wants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 21, The National Labor Relations Board voted 2-1 in favor of new steps to increase the speed of union elections.  The Board hopes to keep election and campaign time to less than 21 days.  Often, there are long delays to unionizing elections because of legal challenges brought by the employer.  The Board wants to require that these challenges be postponed until after the employees have voted for or against the union.  These changes were first proposed in June and the NLRB held public hearings and reviewed thousands of public comments.  The new rules will likely be challenged by employers in court.  More coverage <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/business/nlrb-adopts-rules-to-speed-unionization-votes.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>This was the Board&#8217;s last major policy decision before it lost one member, which leaves it without a quorum to act.  President Obama has nominated Sharon Block and Richard Griffin to the Board.  Ms. Block is currently deputy assistant secretary of Congressional affairs with the Labor Department.  Mr. Griffin has served on the board of the AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee since 1994 and is general counsel to the International Union of Operating Engineers.  Republicans may well block these nominations in an effort to prevent the Board from functioning at all.  More coverage <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/15/business/obama-names-two-to-serve-on-nlrb.html?_r=1">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/nlrb-to-speed-up-unionizing-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Extends Unemployment Benefits for Two Months</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/congress-extends-unemployment-benefits-for-two-months/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/congress-extends-unemployment-benefits-for-two-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortly before Christmas, House Republicans finally gave in and sensibly agreed to the two-month extension for extended unemployment benefits.  When Congress returns after recess, debate will resume on whether to further continue the vitally needed unemployment insurance programs.  For more information on North Carolina&#8217;s Extended and Emergency Unemployment benefits, see the Division of Employment Security&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly before Christmas, House Republicans finally gave in and sensibly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html">agreed to the two-month extension for extended unemployment benefits</a>.  When Congress returns after recess, debate will resume on whether to further continue the vitally needed unemployment insurance programs.  For more information on North Carolina&#8217;s Extended and Emergency Unemployment benefits, see the Division of Employment Security&#8217;s site, <a href="http://www.ncesc1.com/individual/euc08.asp">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2012/01/congress-extends-unemployment-benefits-for-two-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Still Blocking Extended Unemployment Benefits</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/congress-goes-home-work-undone/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/congress-goes-home-work-undone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House and Senate still have not come to an agreement on extending unemployment benefits for jobless workers.  The federal unemployment provisions for emergency and extended benefits are set to expire during the first week in January.  The U.S.  Labor Department estimates that 3.6 million jobless Americans will lose benefits by March if nothing is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate still have not come to an agreement on extending unemployment benefits for jobless workers.  The federal unemployment provisions for emergency and extended benefits are set to expire during the first week in January.  The U.S.  Labor Department estimates that 3.6 million jobless Americans will lose benefits by March if nothing is done to extend the federal program.  Currently the states finance up to 26 weeks of jobless benefits with the federal government adding up to 73 weeks of benefits, totaling 99 weeks of possible unemployment benefits.  The average unemployed workers is out of work for 41 weeks.  Republicans in Congress seek to reduce the maximum total number of weeks to 59, add unreasonable eligibility requirements, and implement pervasive drug-testing of all unemployed workers.  All of these proposals further prevent economic recovery, undermine the spirit of the unemployment system, and essentially tar the unemployed as drug addicts.  Republican obstructionism and inaction has reached a critical point, and without action on these issues the nation will face even greater hardship than the Great Recession has already inflicted.  More coverage <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/21/us/with-impasse-in-congress-3-million-could-lose-jobless-benefits.html?_r=1">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/congress-goes-home-work-undone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Unemployment Benefits Should be Renewed</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NELP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Employment Law Project (NELP) published an excellent paper in October, arguing for a one-year extension of the Federal Unemployment Insurance benefits for unemployed workers.  The paper is entitled &#8220;Hanging On By a Thread: Renew Federal Unemployment Insurance to Aid Families, Boost Stalled Economy&#8221; The paper states: &#8220;Unless Congress reauthorizes the current federal extension [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National <a href="http://pathlaw.com/practice-areas/wage-hour-employment-law/" title="" >Employment Law</a> Project (NELP) published an excellent paper in October, arguing for a one-year extension of the Federal Unemployment Insurance benefits for unemployed workers.  The paper is entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.nelp.org/page/-/UI/2011/NELP_UI_Extension_Report_2011.pdf?nocdn=1">Hanging On By a Thread: Renew Federal Unemployment Insurance to Aid Families, Boost Stalled Economy</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>The paper states: &#8220;Unless Congress reauthorizes the current federal extension programs before the December 31st deadline, millions of workers and their families will be left without their primary means of support to buy food, pay the rent or mortgage, and cover their other most basic necessities.&#8221;</p>
<p>NELP&#8217;s paper also argues that extending benefits will help families as well as give the economy a leg up:  &#8220;Consistent with the prior research, [Wayne Vroman of the Urban Institute] found that the nation’s economy grew by $2 for every dollar spent on unemployment insurance during the latest recession, as unemployed workers spent their benefits in their communities at grocery stores, gas stations, and other retailers and service providers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Majority Leader Harry Reid has <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1211/Reid_threatens_Senate_sessions_through_Christmas.html">vowed</a> to keep Congress in session in D.C. until federal unemployment benefits are renewed for the coming year, even if they have to work through the holidays to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/12/federal-unemployment-benefits-should-be-renewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama Signs Jobs Bill Helping Veterans</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama this week signed into law the first portion of his jobs package. The bill, H.R. 674, which had vast bipartisan support, also known as VOW to Hire Heroes Act, creates tax incentives for companies to hire veterans, especially those who have been unemployed for more than six months and those with service connected disabilities. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama this week signed into law the first portion of his jobs package. The bill, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-674">H.R. 674</a>, which had vast bipartisan support, also known as VOW to Hire Heroes Act, creates tax incentives for companies to hire veterans, especially those who have been unemployed for more than six months and those with service connected disabilities.  Though there has been very little action from Congress on the jobs front, this is an encouraging first step.  Hopefully the House and Senate can get their act together and start really helping unemployed workers secure employment, and in doing so jump-start the economy.  More on the bill <a href="http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/21/president-obama-signs-veterans-tax-credit-bill/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2011/11/president-obama-signs-jobs-bill-helping-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hank Attends Congressional Hearing on Workers’ Compensation</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/hank-attends-congressional-hearing-on-workers-compensation/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/hank-attends-congressional-hearing-on-workers-compensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News of the Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Education and Labor Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Hank Patterson attended a Congressional hearing held by the Workforce Protections Subcommittee of the House Education and Labor Committee, which examined state workers’ compensations systems.  The participants at the hearing discussed that &#8220;workers&#8217; compensation systems have undergone numerous changes in the past decade as many states have begun strictly limiting workers’ compensation benefits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, <a href="http://pathlaw.com/staff/henry-n-patterson-jr/" title="" >Hank Patterson</a> attended a Congressional hearing held by the Workforce Protections Subcommittee of the House Education and Labor Committee, which examined state workers’ compensations systems.  The participants at the hearing discussed that &#8220;<a href="http://pathlaw.com/practice-areas/workers-compensation/" title="" >workers&#8217; compensation</a> systems have undergone numerous changes in the past decade as many  states have begun strictly limiting workers’ compensation benefits –  changes that may be stressing the Social Security Disability Insurance  (SSDI) program. Additionally, the American Medical Association’s (AMA)  guide to assessing injured workers has undergone significant changes in  its latest edition, which has made consequential changes to injured  workers’ evaluation procedure.&#8221;  See the <a href="http://edlabor.house.gov/hearings/2010/11/developments-in-state-workers.shtml">committee site for details</a>, as well as the <a href="http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/statements/20101117WoolseyHearingStatement.pdf">comprehensive opening statement by Representative Lynn Woolsey</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_1595" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 496px"><a href="http://pathlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/Hank-at-Congressional-Hearing.bmp"><img class="size-full wp-image-1595" title="Hank at Congressional Hearing" src="http://pathlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/Hank-at-Congressional-Hearing.bmp" alt="" width="486" height="355" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hank behind witness John Burton</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/hank-attends-congressional-hearing-on-workers-compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions to Lose Unemployment Benefits, Even if Extension Passes; New Course of Action Needed</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monthly Job Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Fiscal Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if Congress manages to extend emergency unemployment benefits for more the millions of workers who could receive them, about four million others will see their benefits end over the next year, unless an entirely new program is created.  This is according to a report recently issued by the President&#8217;s Council of Economic Advisers.  So, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Congress manages to extend emergency unemployment benefits for more the millions of workers who could receive them, about four million others will see their benefits end over the next year, unless an entirely new program is created.  This is according to a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-benefits-99ers-obama_n_791682.html">report recently issued by the President&#8217;s Council of Economic Advisers</a>.  So, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/us/04unemployed.html">the crisis facing some now</a> is going to be experienced by even more later, unless serious job-creating actions are taken.</p>
<p>You would think that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/business/economy/04jobs.html">the latest, terrible monthly jobs report</a> would convince those in power that the Great Recession continues unabated, doing terrible damage to working families.  Those unemployed for long periods face <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/business/economy/03unemployed.html">especially long odds of finding work</a> in today&#8217;s economy.  And, even for those with good jobs, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/20/business/20wages.html">wages are continuing to be cut</a> as even profitable employers take advantage of the ongoing crisis for workers.</p>
<p>Misguided worries about the budget deficit are allowing Republicans and <a href="http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/12/03/casting-light-on-%E2%80%9Cthe-moment-of-truth%E2%80%9D-28850/">the Deficit Commission</a> to pursue Social-Security-cutting, Medicare-slashing, job-destroying agenda instead of a program that can end the Great Recession and put people back to work.  A new course of action is needed, and responsible policy options are out there.  For instance, check out <a href="http://www.ourfiscalsecurity.org/storage/Blueprint_ExecSumm.pdf">the program</a> set out by <a href="http://www.ourfiscalsecurity.org/fiscal-blueprint">Our Fiscal Security</a>, a collaborative effort of Demos, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and The Century Foundation (TCF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/millions-to-lose-unemployment-benefits-even-if-extension-passes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extended Unemployment Blocked by Republicans Again</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/extended-unemployment-blocked-by-republicans-again/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/extended-unemployment-blocked-by-republicans-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Extended unemployment benefits &#8212; providing for up to 99 weeks of benefits &#8212; have expired again because of Republican obstruction.  Up to 2 million long-term job-seekers could lose their benefits by the end of the year.  Coverage can be found here.  Once again, Republicans oppose helping the unemployed in the name of the budget deficit, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extended unemployment benefits &#8212; providing for up to 99 weeks of benefits &#8212; have expired again because of Republican obstruction.  Up to 2 million long-term job-seekers could lose their benefits by the end of the year.  Coverage can be found <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40447966/ns/politics-more_politics/">here</a>.  Once again, Republicans oppose helping the unemployed in the name of the budget deficit, even as they stop all other business to protect tax cuts for the very wealthy.</p>
<p>Hopefully their obstruction can be overcome some time this month so that benefits do not lapse for long.  For the latest on benefits in North Carolina, look for information at the <a href="http://www.ncesc1.com/individual/euc08QA.asp">North Carolina Employment Security Commission</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/12/extended-unemployment-blocked-by-republicans-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Provides Funds to Save Teacher Jobs</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Assistants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the Senate finally passed the $26 billion package to aid states that are still reeling from the effects of the recession.  The legislation provides $10 billion to retain teachers who might otherwise lose jobs to cutbacks, and an additional $16 billion to help states with rising health care costs.  The bill was quickly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Senate <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/us/politics/06cong.html">finally passed</a> the $26 billion package to aid states that are still reeling from the effects of the recession.  The legislation provides $10 billion to retain teachers who might otherwise lose jobs to cutbacks, and an additional $16 billion to help states with rising health care costs.  The bill was quickly passed by the House and signed by President Obama.</p>
<p>Of that amount, North Carolina received about $300 million to save teachers&#8217; jobs.  North Carolina leaders are <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/08/13/626826/nc-explores-use-of-300-million.html">now figuring out when and how to use the money</a>.  Obviously, one possibility would be to use some of the funds to re-hire teachers and teaching assistants who were recently laid off due to budget cuts.  Also, some amount may be saved till next year, when the state&#8217;s deficit will reach its highest level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/08/congress-provides-funds-to-save-teacher-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Extension Finally Passed Over Republican Filibuster</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Security Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Democrats, with the help of only two Republicans, were finally available to break the deadlock over the extension of unemployment benefits.  President Obama signed the bill this past Thursday.  This bill provides a continuation of the program of extended benefits for those who exhaust the standard 26 weeks of unemployment benefits.  Coverage is here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Democrats, with the help of only two Republicans, were finally available to break the deadlock over the extension of unemployment benefits.  President Obama signed the bill this past Thursday.  This bill provides a continuation of the program of extended benefits for those who exhaust the standard 26 weeks of unemployment benefits.  Coverage is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/us/politics/21jobs.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/22/AR2010072200785.html">here</a>.  Although this bill is only a small part of the jobs-boosting agenda Congress needs to have, it was still vital for millions of unemployed having great difficulty finding a job in this broken economy.  For an example, see <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/us/18unemployed.html">here</a>.  Although there appears to be too much opposition for additional action on jobs right now, one hopes both parties will come to their senses and realize that the federal government can and must do much more to create sustainable employment growth.</p>
<p>For those seeking benefits, see this note from the <a href="https://www.ncesc.com/default.aspx">North Carolina Employment Security Commission</a>: &#8220;On July 22, 2010, the extension of the Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program was signed into law. The new law extends the filing deadline, but it does not provide for additional EUC08 tiers. The ESC is working with the Department of Labor to implement this change as quickly as possible. If you are currently filing for benefits please continue to do so. If you are not currently filing for benefits our agency will notify you on how to reinstate your claim.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

