<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patterson Harkavy LLP &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathlaw.com/tag/congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathlaw.com</link>
	<description>North Carolina Lawyers • Statewide • Raleigh • Chapel Hill • Greensboro • Charlotte</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Extension Finally Passed Over Republican Filibuster</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Security Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extended Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Democrats, with the help of only two Republicans, were finally available to break the deadlock over the extension of unemployment benefits.  President Obama signed the bill this past Thursday.  This bill provides a continuation of the program of extended benefits for those who exhaust the standard 26 weeks of unemployment benefits.  Coverage is here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Democrats, with the help of only two Republicans, were finally available to break the deadlock over the extension of unemployment benefits.  President Obama signed the bill this past Thursday.  This bill provides a continuation of the program of extended benefits for those who exhaust the standard 26 weeks of unemployment benefits.  Coverage is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/21/us/politics/21jobs.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/22/AR2010072200785.html">here</a>.  Although this bill is only a small part of the jobs-boosting agenda Congress needs to have, it was still vital for millions of unemployed having great difficulty finding a job in this broken economy.  For an example, see <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/us/18unemployed.html">here</a>.  Although there appears to be too much opposition for additional action on jobs right now, one hopes both parties will come to their senses and realize that the federal government can and must do much more to create sustainable employment growth.</p>
<p>For those seeking benefits, see this note from the <a href="https://www.ncesc.com/default.aspx">North Carolina Employment Security Commission</a>: &#8220;On July 22, 2010, the extension of the Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program was signed into law. The new law extends the filing deadline, but it does not provide for additional EUC08 tiers. The ESC is working with the Department of Labor to implement this change as quickly as possible. If you are currently filing for benefits please continue to do so. If you are not currently filing for benefits our agency will notify you on how to reinstate your claim.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/07/unemployment-extension-finally-passed-over-republican-filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Continue Assault on Unemployed Workers</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill, mustering the 41 votes needed on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Republicans (with the help of one Democrat, Ben Nelson) have continued their filibuster of the Democrats&#8217; jobs bill,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/us/politics/25jobs.html"> mustering the 41 votes needed</a> on Thursday to prevent the bill from passage.  Republican obstructionism will ultimately spell the end of extended unemployment benefits for millions, even as the economy is nowhere near creating significant job growth.</p>
<p>On top of that, failure to pass the bills means states <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26states.html">will not receive the much-needed $23 billion</a> to pay for sharply rising Medicaid costs.  (The great recession has swelled the ranks of those eligible for health insurance through Medicaid.)  Without this money, states will be forced to impose even greater cut backs, which will mean lost jobs for teachers and other state employees.</p>
<p>Republicans say they oppose the bill on the grounds that it raises the deficit, but what they really oppose are the small tax increases (such as one on hedge fund managers) that would be used to pay for the bill.  Disappointingly, the NY Times notes that the &#8220;Obama administration has not fought aggressively for the legislation.&#8221;  It appears the President is not focusing on jobs, which should be his highest priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-assault-on-unemployed-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Continue to Hold Up Unemployment Extension in Senate</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-to-hold-up-unemployment-extension-in-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-to-hold-up-unemployment-extension-in-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a vote Thursday night, Senate Democrats were unable to overcome the Republic filibuster of the bill that contains the much-needed extension of unemployment benefits.  Even though the cost of the bill had been reduced to alleviate the (misguided) concerns of increasing the federal deficit, all Republicans and two Democrats maintained their opposition.  This bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a vote Thursday night, Senate Democrats were <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/us/politics/18cong.html">unable to overcome the Republic filibuster</a> of the bill that contains the much-needed extension of unemployment benefits.  Even though the cost of the bill had been reduced to alleviate the (misguided) concerns of increasing the federal deficit, all Republicans and two Democrats maintained their opposition.  This bill would not only extend emergency unemployment benefits, but also provide aid to states for health care costs, and pay for that spending with increased taxes on oil companies and hedge fund managers.  Hard to argue with those ideas.  More coverage <a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/06/18/senate-republicans-kill-jobs-bill-block-jobless-aid/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/republicans-continue-to-hold-up-unemployment-extension-in-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-Ed Calling for Paid Maternity and Family Leave</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternity Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unpaid Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work and Family Balance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An op-ed in the Washington Post calls for paid family and maternity leave because the 12 weeks of unpaid leave provided by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is grossly inadequate.  Sharon Lerner traces the history of legislative efforts to provide paid leave to support workers&#8217; families, the compromised law that is the FMLA, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An op-ed in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/11/AR2010061103251.html">calls for paid family and maternity leave</a> because the 12 weeks of unpaid leave provided by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is grossly inadequate.  Sharon Lerner traces the history of legislative efforts to provide paid leave to support workers&#8217; families, the compromised law that is the FMLA, and the pernicious effects of inadequate paid leave.  The need for reform is stark:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to paid maternity leave, the United States is in the postpartum dark ages.  One hundred and seventy-seven nations &#8212; including Djibouti, Haiti and Afghanistan &#8212; have laws on the books requiring that all women, and in some cases men, receive both income and job-protected time off after the birth of a child. But here, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 provides only unpaid leave, and most working mothers don&#8217;t get to stay home with their newborns for the 12 weeks allowed by the law. Many aren&#8217;t covered by the FMLA; others can&#8217;t afford to take unpaid time off. Some go back to work a few weeks after giving birth, and some go back after mere days.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/op-ed-calling-for-paid-maternity-and-family-leave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Passes Unemployment Extension Without Cobra Benefits; Senate Yet to Act</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/house-passes-unemployment-extension-without-cobra-benefits-senate-yet-to-act/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/house-passes-unemployment-extension-without-cobra-benefits-senate-yet-to-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 28, 2010, the House passed a watered-down jobs bill. It extends the extra unemployment benefits program for another six months, though those benefits have now expired as of the end of May. Very significantly, the House bill did not include an extension of the expanded COBRA program for health insurance. The Senate has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 28, 2010, the House <a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/05/28/house-passes-watered-down-jobs-bill-too-late-to-help-jobless/">passed a watered-down jobs bill</a>.  It extends the extra unemployment benefits program for another six months, though those benefits have now expired as of the end of May.  Very significantly, the House bill did not include an extension of the expanded COBRA program for health insurance.</p>
<p>The Senate has yet to act.  Because the unemployment benefits have expired, unemployed workers are losing benefits right now, and will cotninue to until the Senate passes a matching bill.  The N&amp;O has <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/06/08/520224/unemployment-checks-dry-up.html">this article</a> on effects to workers in North Carolina.  It is imperitive that the Senate quickly pass a bill to extend the unemployment benefits program, and include an extension of COBRA benefits.  With the unemployment rate still near 11% in North Carolina, unemployed and uninsured workers cannot afford more delay from Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/06/house-passes-unemployment-extension-without-cobra-benefits-senate-yet-to-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Block Unemployment Benefits Again</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/republicans-block-unemployment-benefits-again/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/republicans-block-unemployment-benefits-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans have once again blocked a much-needed extension of unemployment benefits, ignoring the needs of millions of workers that rely on those benefits.  This time, it is Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn who has single-handedly denied workers benefits.  From the New York Times: &#8220;As a result, some people who have been out of work for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Republicans have once again blocked a much-needed extension of unemployment benefits, ignoring the needs of millions of workers that rely on those benefits.  This time, it is Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn who has single-handedly denied workers benefits.  From the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/us/26jobless.html"> New York Times</a>: &#8220;As a result, some people who have been out of work for more than six months will at least temporarily lose benefits. Health insurance subsidies for the jobless will also expire.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/republicans-block-unemployment-benefits-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Signs Landmark Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/president-signs-landmark-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/president-signs-landmark-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 23, after the House and the Senate were finally able to resolve their differences, President Obama signed into law the landmark health care bill that promises to mark affordable health care a reality for all Americans.  Extensive coverage of the act can be found elsewhere, but this is a good summary of how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 23, after the House and the Senate were finally able to resolve their differences, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-and-vice-president-signing-health-insurance-reform-bill">President Obama signed into law</a> the landmark health care bill that promises to mark affordable health care a reality for all Americans.  Extensive coverage of the act can be found <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/health_insurance_and_managed_care/health_care_reform/index.html">elsewhere</a>, but this is a good summary of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/your-money/health-insurance/22consumer.html">how it effects workers and individuals</a>.</p>
<p>Update: Congress has also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/health/policy/26health.html">passed a set of amendments to the act</a>, completing the legislative saga.  The changes increase the levels of subsidies that will help moderate-income Americans afford private insurance, alter some of the taxes that help pay for the bill, and close the Medicare prescription drug doughnut hole among others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/president-signs-landmark-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hank Speaks on Workers&#8217; Compensation at Iowa Conference</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/hank-speaks-on-workers-compensation-at-iowa-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/hank-speaks-on-workers-compensation-at-iowa-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News of the Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Association of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hank Patterson spoke at the Iowa Association of Justice&#8217;s 19 Annual Workers&#8217; Compensation Seminar last month in Des Moines.  His presentation discussed National Legilsation and Policy Priorities for Workers Compensation, and specifically addressed Medicare reform (see HR 2641 &#8212; Medicare Secondary Payer and Workers&#8217; Compensation Settlement Agreements Act of 2009), the National Commission on State [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/staff/henry-n-patterson-jr/" title="" >Hank Patterson</a> spoke at the Iowa Association of Justice&#8217;s 19 Annual <a href="/practice-areas/workers-compensation/" title="" >Workers&#8217; Compensation</a> Seminar last month in Des Moines.  His presentation discussed National Legilsation and Policy Priorities for Workers Compensation, and specifically addressed Medicare reform (see <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2641">HR 2641 &#8212; Medicare Secondary Payer and Workers&#8217; Compensation Settlement Agreements Act of 2009</a>), the National Commission on State Workers&#8217; Compensation Laws Act (<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-635">HR 635</a>), and issues surrounding the AMA Guides on Disability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/hank-speaks-on-workers-compensation-at-iowa-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Signs Bill Temporarily Extending COBRA, Unemployment Benefits; Longer Extension Being Considered</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-bill-temporarily-extending-cobra-unemployment-benefits-longer-extension-being-considered/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-bill-temporarily-extending-cobra-unemployment-benefits-longer-extension-being-considered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 2, President Obama signed the Temporary Extension Act of 2010 (summary here), a bill that will extend the 65 percent premium COBRA subsidy through March 31, 2010, and unemployment assistance benefits through April 5, 2010.  The Senate passed this bill after Republican Senator Jim Bunning finally abandoned his misguided efforts to block it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 2, President Obama <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/statement-press-secretary-hr-4691" target="_blank">signed</a> the Temporary Extension Act of 2010 (<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4691&amp;tab=summary">summary here</a>), a bill that will extend the 65 percent premium COBRA subsidy through March 31, 2010, and unemployment assistance benefits through April 5, 2010.  The Senate passed this bill after Republican Senator Jim Bunning finally abandoned his misguided efforts to block it.</p>
<p>On March 10, the Senate passed the Tax Extender Act of 2009, legislation that would extend until December 31, 2010 the 65% premium COBRA subsidies and emergency unemployment insurance benefits.  The bill now has to be reconciled with the version the House passed late last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/03/obama-signs-bill-temporarily-extending-cobra-unemployment-benefits-longer-extension-being-considered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Senator Blocking Unemployment and COBRA Benefits</title>
		<link>http://pathlaw.com/2010/02/republican-senator-blocking-unemployment-and-cobra-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://pathlaw.com/2010/02/republican-senator-blocking-unemployment-and-cobra-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Narendra Ghosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathlaw.com/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inexplicably, Republican Senator Jim Bunning has held up a much-needed extension of unemployment and COBRA benefits.  Bunning has single-handily blocked a vote on a 30-day extension by being the only senator to oppose a unanimous consent motion to vote on the bill, which was passed earlier by the House. The extended benefits are scheduled to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inexplicably, Republican Senator Jim Bunning has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/us/27cong.html">held up a much-needed extension of unemployment and COBRA benefits</a>.  Bunning has single-handily blocked a vote on a 30-day extension by being the only senator to oppose a unanimous consent motion to vote on the bill, which was passed earlier by the House. The extended benefits are scheduled to expire today.  Thousands may lose benefits because of Bunning &#8212; how many depending on how quickly Democrats can force a vote on the bill.  This callous disregard of the needs of working class Americans is outrageous, as are Senate rules which allow a single Senator to hold up such essential legislation.</p>
<p>The stress of losing a job is hard enough, and has been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/us/25stress.html">shown to create adverse health effects</a>, but the least the government can do is provide unemployment benefits in a timely manner.  More coverage <a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/02/26/bunning-to-jobless-workers-tough-s_-_-_/">here</a> and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/jim_bunnings_campaign_to_end_t.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pathlaw.com/2010/02/republican-senator-blocking-unemployment-and-cobra-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
